On “Types”

20 04 2015

When I was in undergraduate school, the prevailing sentiment was that you were either a skinny actress, or a fat actress. For men, there was, and seems to still be, a variety of sizes you can be. You can be short and muscular, short and fat, short and skinny, tall and skinny, medium and fat, tall and pudgy – but for women… not so much. You are either a waif, or very overweight, and everyone in between just is…… uncastable. Oh, and whether you are a waif or overweight – you must be an extreme in looks as well: waify or hefty bombshell, or waify or hefty ugly. But nothing in between, God forbid the in between!

Fortunately, that perspective seems to be changing, and we see a much wider variety of women on television. The tough part is, we still see mostly only the same TYPE of woman in the roles of the love interest or the DESIRABLE woman. She is usually very tiny in every way: short, very thin, and very typically beautiful. It is as if Hollywood cannot imagine any man would want to fall in love with a woman over 5’2” and 90 lbs. Let me be clear, I am not ranting against those tiny goddesses that populate our movies and tv shows – I think they are beautiful and amazing! I just think it skews out perspective when they are the only women seen as “desirable” in film.

I have found, with the exception of this tiny goddess type, that you CAN transcend TYPE, and that TYPE is a myth. It really is. Are there roles you might be more IMEMDIATELY adept AT? Certainly. But TYPE is just another lie we tell ourselves to avoid the fact that the REASON we were NOT CAST. Assuming you did all your prep work and were prepared, that REASON is that it WAS NOT YOUR ROLE. That’s it.

HOWEVER, it is important to understand your TYPE, or how you come across even when doing nothing. Just as a baseline. Just as an exercise to know yourself, and to know how to be more still or less still or more simple in your delivery when you are doing film work.

More later…




One response

1 06 2015

I have noticed that too. It reminds me if the idea that women can only take up so much space and as they get taller, they must be lankier. Also the fact that often quite tiny women are thought of as “too big” or the “wrong shape” because the are not a willowy, petite (and yes you must be both) size 0. Never mind those who are NOT tiny.

Leave a Reply to marybethorama Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: